Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Gemma Mason's avatar

I must admit that I have never been much of a fan of the “battle” model of heterosexuality. Conventionally, sex in this model happens after the man has won, and I quite like sex but I’ve never been especially fond of pretending to lose. Not that I have to worry about any of this in the private sub-society of my marriage, mind you, but it was a source of some frustration back when I was single.

I am told that Nabokov always insisted that his butterflies were just butterflies. He was an entomologist, as you may know. Mind you, I’m inclined to interpret this as saying that they were, to him, “butterflies” as he understood them—with sufficient complexity that they could not be reduced to simple symbolism. More like a rich signifier than a non-signifier.

My own thesis was on water, and when it shows up in my writing it means something, but a big part of what it means might indeed be well described, in a sense, as “water.”

Nathan Keller's avatar

But he said neurosis. I will watch it again because even quaker church is time expensive and i might have to start stealing to live. You would have to write the Religion is the slow hallucination movement. That is how it is for me I doodle my freest like Dali's notebook sketches if you have seen those, during quiet meeting. I cannot generalize my experience to the rest... honestly you really think OCD sufferers might be having twisted visions to behave in that way? You could be right. I am asking folks How craaazy are you? Electriclightorchestra things are nuts.

4 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?